Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO-NOT-MERGE] Latest paradox deps test #67

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

@mdedetrich mdedetrich commented Feb 14, 2024

This PR is just here to demonstrate what is said here, specifically that even though sbt-paradox-material-theme may be compiled against sbt-paradox/sbt-paradox-theme 0.9.2, it will work completely fine with sbt-paradox/sbt-paradox-theme 0.10.6

In order to demonstrate this, check out the PR's branch and make sure to set JDK to 11 (since sbt-paradox/sbt-paradox-theme 0.10.6 only supports JDK 11+) and run the following command

sbt "sbt-paradox-material-theme/scripted paradox/latest-paradox-deps"

Ideally we would actually add this as a scripted test to the repo but unfortunately there isn't an easy way to do this since the rest of the tests only run on JDK 8 and this scripted test needs to be run with JDK 11 specifically (this is why the CI is failing)

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
addSbtPlugin("com.lightbend.paradox" % "sbt-paradox" % "0.10.6")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the important part, as you can see we are loading the most recent version of sbt-paradox/sbt-paradox-theme

This was referenced Feb 14, 2024
@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing PR since it was just a demonstration

@mdedetrich mdedetrich closed this Feb 22, 2024
@mdedetrich mdedetrich deleted the latest-paradox-depds-test branch February 22, 2024 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant